Welcome to the Mad Panda

You are
on the UK Site

Click here to go
to the USA Site
home  |  about us  |  contact  |  latest articles   |  voting  |  results  |  action taken  |  hall of fame  |  hall of shame  |  advertise
 
 

home page » articles » Transport » Motoring » submit your views

Vote Here

Credit crunch suggestion 1

Uninsured drivers

We should have a purge on uninsured drivers, with a fine of £500 and the cars siezed and sold. At an average sale price of £1,000 per sale we could raise between £1,500 million and £3,000 million, at least. That should help the coffers and also improve the air quality, which apparantly would help NHS costs. It would also make insurance cheaper for the law abiding.

The government estimates that there are over one million vehicles on our roads without insurance and/or tax. The government is also promoting several “initiatives” to persuade motorists to use public transport and ease congestion.

The government are now quoting an estimate of 2 million uninsured drivers on our roads.
Given that in a recent London crackdown large quantities of drugs and expensive cars were seized, surely the message has been received that this activity is closely linked with major crime. Also are the police and the government not missing a trick here as this sort of crackdown probably made a profit.

Why are we not doing this? The priority on all counts should be to remove these estimated one/two million illegal vehicles.

Do you agree?
The DVLA should work with the insurance companies to identify uninsured vehicles and drivers for the police to prosecute. Do you agree?
The insurance companies could also provide a wallet sized card of details for each insured person/car. If it was then compulsory to carry this card and driving licence and the police had the power to impound cars on the spot until the documents were produced, we could soon eradicate this practice.
Do you agree?
Traffic congestion charging.

Foreign diplomats in London are refusing to pay the congestion charge as they regard it as a tax and they are exempt from taxation. This has not been challenged by the London Mayor.
The congestion charge is just another tax on the motorist.

Do you agree?

There are sophisticated systems and published figures to measure the average speed and level of London traffic as a guide to the effect of the congestion charging.
If the congestion charge is working as well as London’s mayor claims why are there still bus lanes? Have any tests been carried out to establish traffic flow and congestion with all bus lanes suspended? We suspect that all traffic will flow better without the bus lanes.

This should be independently tested, in the original London congestion zone, over an extended period of at least 3 months and no further congestion zones considered until all other methods of easing congestion have been tested. Do you agree?
 

 

 

 Back

Adverts

Copyright © The Mad Panda 2006. All Rights Reserved. All 3rd party trademarks are hereby acknowledged.